Skip to main content
After canonic ingest writes reviewable diffs, use review for an interactive, item-by-item pass, or apply to batch-apply everything still pending, for example after editing diffs by hand.

​
canonic review

Interactively review pending proposals one by one, in numeric order.
For each pending proposal you’re shown the diff and prompted:
  • freeze writes the file and sets meta.frozen: true: a subsequent canonic ingest flags any conflicting evidence instead of editing the fact, regardless of tier.
  • curate writes the file and sets meta.provenance: human_curated: the only way a fact gets promoted out of inferred. A curated fact is protected from future inferred evidence the same way any other human_curated fact is (see provenance tiers), but unlike freeze it isn’t an unconditional lock: equally-or-more-authoritative future evidence can still propose an edit.
Resumable: quitting or crashing mid-review picks back up at the first still-pending item on the next invocation.

​
canonic apply

Batch-apply all pending proposals from a run directory.
Proposals already in a terminal state (accepted / rejected / frozen / curated), or whose diff file was deleted, are silently skipped. No git interaction. Applied files appear as unstaged changes in your working tree. canonic apply doesn’t expose freeze or curate: every applied proposal resolves to accepted. Use canonic review for either.